J.J. Lewis
  • Home
  • About Me
  • Academic Life
    • Central Michigan University >
      • Undergraduate Academic Research
    • San Diego State University >
      • EDL 600
      • EDL 610
      • EDL 630
      • EDL 650
      • EDL 655
      • EDL 680
      • EDL 680
      • EDL 690
      • EDL 795A
      • EDL 795B
    • University of Southern California
  • Leading Edge
    • Evolution of Online and Blended Learning
    • Accessibility
    • Building & Maintaining Community
    • Digital Citizenship, Literacy & Responsible Learning Practices
    • Collaboration, Pedagogy, and Practices
    • Online Assessment & Evaluation
    • Are You Ready for Online & Blended Teaching?
  • Blog
  • Contact Me

The Journey ...

Input-Oriented Accountability

7/26/2016

1 Comment

 
​In my EDL 680 course, which is a Seminar for Personalized Learning and Leading Through Technology, we are reading Yong Zhao's "Catching Up or Leading the Way." A section that caught my eye was on input-oriented accountability, which as Zhao puts it, measures the quality of schools by looking at the quality of educational resources and opportunities they provide to each student."

​This is timely as the Academy of Arts and Sciences begins to look at charter renewals for three of our five charters we operate (the other two are due for renewal during the 2017-18 school year).  I spent the afternoon today at the California Charter Schools Association offices in LA, sitting through their Charter Renewal Workshop.  In addition to revisions and updates to the charter document itself, authorizers want to see, and EdCode stipulates, the presentation of data.  They want to see the program is successful, and successfully impacting the lives of those who attend the program.  Some of the data points are cohort graduation rates, absence numbers, and test scores from the SBAC test.  The State Board of Education is working on a new matrix, and the CCSA has some standards as well.  What I learned today is if AAS does not meet certain thresholds, even as a member of CCSA, they would advocate against our charter renewal.  Luckily, I believe we are meeting these standards.

​But are they correct?  Should we be judged on test scores, when even folks like myself are not the best test-takers but can show my understanding in a different way.  Is this truly a personalized approach, or one that believes every American child is the same: learns the same, applies knowledge the same, and the like.  Or would a better measure of success for a school like ours be more in line with an input-oriented accountability system?  Some of the measures that Zhao shares include teachers ("does the school have a staff that is highly qualified and motivated to help students learn?"), curriculum ("does the school implement a broad and rigorous curriculum relevant to all students?"), opportunities to be different ("does the school make arrangements to enable students who have different talents to pursue the?), and more.  These are interesting data points, and ones that would show a commitment to each individual scholar.  In fact, it would help make the point of our mission statement at AAS: "to inspire and develop innovative, creative, self-directed learners, one scholar at a time."

​As I continue with SDSU's program, I continue to learn new ways of thinking and am excited to share these ideas with my professional networks and my colleagues at AAS. 
1 Comment
Maria Martinez
7/29/2016 12:07:33 am

Hello J.J.,

I know for a fact that I am not a good test taker, and may students aren't, but then NCLB is basing their intelligence on test taking. Test taking is not for everyone, because students have different learning styles,and tests do not cater to all of them. For instance, when I study for a test, I have studied the material in depth, and feel comfortable, but then I end up failing the test. Especially, when tests are designed to have tricky or vague questions. I am glad our education system is moving away from NCLB.

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    Author

    J.J. Lewis - a blog sharing the journey throughout SDSU's MA.EL. program.

    Archives

    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016

    Categories

    All
    AAS
    CCS
    EDL 600
    EDL 610
    EDL 630
    EDL 650
    EDL 655
    EDL 680
    EDL 899
    Phi Tau

    RSS Feed

Proudly powered by Weebly
  • Home
  • About Me
  • Academic Life
    • Central Michigan University >
      • Undergraduate Academic Research
    • San Diego State University >
      • EDL 600
      • EDL 610
      • EDL 630
      • EDL 650
      • EDL 655
      • EDL 680
      • EDL 680
      • EDL 690
      • EDL 795A
      • EDL 795B
    • University of Southern California
  • Leading Edge
    • Evolution of Online and Blended Learning
    • Accessibility
    • Building & Maintaining Community
    • Digital Citizenship, Literacy & Responsible Learning Practices
    • Collaboration, Pedagogy, and Practices
    • Online Assessment & Evaluation
    • Are You Ready for Online & Blended Teaching?
  • Blog
  • Contact Me